By Topic

Comments on "A passivity-based method for induction motor control" [with reply]

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
J. Chiasson ; ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; R. T. Novotnak ; L. U. Gokdere ; M. A. Simaan

In the paper by L.U. Gokdere and M.A. Simaan (see ibid., vol. 44, p.688-95, 1997), a comparison is made between a passivity based controller and an input-output linearization controller. We point out that this comparison is not valid as the same trajectory was not used for both controllers. The original authors reply to this comment pointing out that there is experimental evidence demonstrating the benefits of the passivity-based controller developed for induction motors. These include closer tracking of the same mechanical trajectory, and less sensitivity to magnetic saturation, when compared with the input-output linearization controller.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics  (Volume:46 ,  Issue: 3 )