By Topic

Drop behavior of RED for bursty and smooth traffic

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Bonald, T. ; INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France ; May, M.

We prove analytically that, as claimed in Jacobson and Floyd's (1993) initial paper on RED, RED gateways “avoid the bias against bursty traffic”, meaning that bursty traffic suffers more losses than smooth traffic with tail drop (TD) gateways, but both types of traffic suffer equally with RED gateways. We also show, again as claimed by Jacobson and Floyd, that RED gateways mark or drop packets from a connection at a rate proportional to that connection's arrival rate. Interestingly, both properties above only hold when the bursty traffic may be modeled by Poisson arrivals of bursts; we exhibit non-Poisson cases where these properties do not hold at all. We conclude the paper with a discussion on the implication of these results on traffic management in the Internet

Published in:

Quality of Service, 1999. IWQoS '99. 1999 Seventh International Workshop on

Date of Conference:

1999