By Topic

Combined ultrasound and near infrared diffused light imaging in a test object

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Quing Zhu ; Dept. of Electr. & Syst. Eng., Connecticut Univ., Storrs, CT, USA ; Sullivan, D. ; Chance, B. ; Dambro, T.

We have investigated the use of combining near infrared (NIR) diffuse light and ultrasound imaging methods to increase the detection sensitivity and to reduce the false alarm rate in small target detection. A line-of-sight optical projection through a test object is identified from an amplitude null and a sharp phase transition produced by diffusive waves originating from two in-phase (initial phase 0/spl deg/) and out-of-phase (initial phase 180/spl deg/) light emitting diode sources. This line-of-sight is scanned across a scattering phantom. A complete ultrasound B-scan image is recorded at each projected line in the optical scan. Each acoustic image plane is bisected by the optical beam path and lies in the optical scan plane. The scattering phantom simulates acoustic and optical properties of homogeneous tissue. A single small cylinder-like object simulating some acoustic and optical breast tumor properties is inserted at various places in the scattering phantom. With this single object, the optical scanning identifies the line-of-sight passing through the simulated tumor quite well. Most of these simulated tumors were at or below the threshold for acoustic detection and were not seen consistently with unguided ultrasound. For tests in which a target was apparently detected optically, the selected line-of-sight was indicated in each of three adjacent ultrasound images. Two radiologist observers were statistically more accurate (83%) in identifying the target location on the optically-selected ultrasound images than in the unmarked images (52%). That is, in these single-targets of homogeneous scattering background, the optical technique usually provided the correct line-of-sight, and ultrasound generally showed the location along that line.

Published in:

Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:46 ,  Issue: 3 )