Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

Is redundancy necessary to reduce delay?

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)

The question of whether single stuck-at-fault redundancies are necessary to increase performance or whether they are only an unnecessary by-product of performance optimization is addressed. A constructive resolution of this question is given in the form of an algorithm that takes as input a combinational circuit and returns an irredundant circuit that is as fast. The utility of this algorithm is demonstrated on a well-known circuit, the carry-skip adder, and a novel irredundant design of that adder is presented. As the algorithm may either increase or decrease circuit area, the authors leave unresolved the question as to whether every circuit has an irredundant circuit that is at least as fast and is of equal or lesser area

Published in:

Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:10 ,  Issue: 4 )

Date of Publication:

Apr 1991

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.