Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

A comparison of two torus-based k-coteries

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Lang, S.D. ; Sch. of Comput. Sci., Central Florida Univ., Orlando, FL, USA ; Mao, L.J.

We extend a torus-based coterie structure for distributed mutual exclusion to allow k multiple entries in a critical section. In the original coterie, the system nodes are logically arranged in a rectangle, called a torus, in which the last row (column) is followed by the first row (column) using end wraparound. A torus quorum consists of a head and a tail, where the head contains one entire row and the tail contains one node from each of the s succeeding rows, s⩾1 is a system parameter. It has been shown that by setting s=[h/2], where h=the number of rows, the collection of torus quorums form an equal-sized, equal-responsibility coterie. In this paper we propose two extensions to k-coteries: the Div-Torus method divides the system nodes into k clusters and runs a separate instance of a torus coterie in each cluster; the k-Torus method uses quorums of tail s=[h/(k+1)]. We compare the quorum size and quorum availability of the two proposed methods, and against the DIV method which is based on the majority quorums in each of the k divided clusters, assuming the node reliability is a constant. Numerical data demonstrate that DIV and Div-Torus have similar system availability, better than that of the k-Torus, although all 3 methods' availability becomes comparable when the node reliability is higher than 0.9. However, Div-Torus has the smallest quorum size and k-Torus the second smallest, which has the potential of causing less network traffic when requesting permissions from a quorum

Published in:

Parallel and Distributed Systems, 1998. Proceedings. 1998 International Conference on

Date of Conference:

14-16 Dec 1998

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.