Close category search window
 

Quantitative 131I SPECT with triple energy window Compton scatter correction

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Dewaraja, Y. ; Div. of Nucl. Med., Michigan Univ. Med. Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA ; Jia Li ; Koral, K.

In this work accuracy of quantitative 131I SPECT with triple energy window (TEW) scatter correction is evaluated by phantom measurements. The application is tumor imaging of B-cell lymphoma patients treated with 131I radioimmunotherapy. The TEW method is a pixel by pixel correction where the scatter fraction in the photopeak window is estimated by linear interpolation between two adjacent narrow sub-windows. For the phantom measurements performed in this work the TEW estimate of scattered counts was close to one half of the total photopeak window counts. Quantification procedure includes marker based X-ray CT-SPECT image fusion to determine object boundaries and to generate attenuation maps. TEW scatter correction significantly reduces the effect of background activity on reconstructed counts within an object, but it still exists due to the finite spatial resolution of the system. Therefore, a background dependent calibration factor had to be used to achieve good quantitative accuracy. Quantitative accuracy with TEW correction was 5% and 14% for a tumor and lung respectively of a physical phantom with non-uniform activity and non-uniform scattering medium. With no scatter subtraction but using a background dependent calibration the quantitative accuracy was 7% and 18% for the tumor and lung respectively

Published in:
Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:45 ,  Issue: 6 )

Date of Publication: Dec 1998

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.