By Topic

Efficient differential timeslice computation

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Torp, K. ; Dept. of Comput. Sci., Aalborg Univ., Denmark ; Mark, L. ; Jensen, Christian S.

Transaction-time databases support access to not only the current database state, but also previous database states. Supporting access to previous database states requires large quantities of data and necessitates efficient temporal query processing techniques. Previously, we presented a log based storage structure and algorithms for the differential computation of previous database states. Timeslices-i.e., previous database states-are computed by traversing a log of database changes, using previously computed and cached timeslices as outsets. When computing a new timeslice, the cache will contain two candidate outsets: an earlier outset and a later outset. The new timeslice can be computed by either incrementally updating the earlier outset or decrementally “downdating” the later outset using the log. The cost of this computation is determined by the size of the log between the outset and the new timeslice. The paper proposes an efficient algorithm that identifies the cheaper outset for the differential computation. The basic idea is to compute the sizes of the two pieces of the log by maintaining and using a tree structure on the timestamps of the database changes in the log. The lack of a homogeneous node structure, a controllable and high fill factor for nodes, and of appropriate node allocation in existing tree structures (e.g., B+ trees, Monotonic B+ trees, and Append only trees) render existing tree structures unsuited for our use. Consequently, a specialized tree structure, the pointer-less insertion tree, is developed to support the algorithm. As a proof of concept, we have implemented a main memory version of the algorithm and its tree structure

Published in:

Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:10 ,  Issue: 4 )