By Topic

On the complexity of designing optimal branch-and-combine clock networks

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
El-Amawy, A. ; Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA, USA ; Kulasinghe, P.

Recently, an unconventional clock distribution scheme, called Branch-and-Combine (BaC) was proposed. The scheme is the first to guarantee constant skew upper bound irrespective of the clocked network's size. In BaC clocking, a set of interconnected nodes perform simple processing on clock signals such that the path from the source to any node is automatically and adaptively selected such that it is the shortest delay path. The graph underlying a BaC network is constrained by the requirement that each pair of adjacent nodes is in a cycle of length ⩽k, where k is the feature cycle length. The graph representing such a network is called a BaC(k) graph. The feature cycle length (k) is an important parameter upon which skew bound and node function depend. We study the complexity of the general problem of designing a minimum cost BaC network for clocking a data processing network of arbitrary topology so that a certain feature cycle length is satisfied. We define two versions of the problem, differing in the way we are allowed to place edges in the graph representing the BaC network. We show that, in both cases, the general optimization problem is NP hard. We also provide efficient heuristic algorithms for both versions of the optimization problem. When k=2, the two versions of the optimization problem become the same and can be solved in polynomial time. For k=3, the complexity is still unknown

Published in:

Computers, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:47 ,  Issue: 2 )