Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Nonlinear wavelet image processing: variational problems, compression, and noise removal through wavelet shrinkage

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Chambolle, A. ; CEREMADE, Univ. de Paris-Dauphine, France ; De Vore, R.A. ; Nam-Yong Lee ; Lucier, B.J.

This paper examines the relationship between wavelet-based image processing algorithms and variational problems. Algorithms are derived as exact or approximate minimizers of variational problems; in particular, we show that wavelet shrinkage can be considered the exact minimizer of the following problem. Given an image F defined on a square I, minimize over all g in the Besov space B11(L1(I)) the functional |F-g|L2(I)2+λ|g|(B11(L1(I))). We use the theory of nonlinear wavelet image compression in L2(I) to derive accurate error bounds for noise removal through wavelet shrinkage applied to images corrupted with i.i.d., mean zero, Gaussian noise. A new signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which we claim more accurately reflects the visual perception of noise in images, arises in this derivation. We present extensive computations that support the hypothesis that near-optimal shrinkage parameters can be derived if one knows (or can estimate) only two parameters about an image F: the largest α for which F∈Bqα(Lq(I)),1/q=α/2+1/2, and the norm |F|Bqα(Lq(I)). Both theoretical and experimental results indicate that our choice of shrinkage parameters yields uniformly better results than Donoho and Johnstone's VisuShrink procedure; an example suggests, however, that Donoho and Johnstone's (1994, 1995, 1996) SureShrink method, which uses a different shrinkage parameter for each dyadic level, achieves a lower error than our procedure.

Published in:

Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:7 ,  Issue: 3 )

Date of Publication:

March 1998

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.