By Topic

The evolution of a questionnaire for engineers: A PSYCHOM '72 paper

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
A. J. Macek ; Honeywell Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.; North Star Research and Development Institute, Minneapolis, Minn. 55406

During an effort to and promising lines of development for new products, it became necessary to find out from experienced production engineers what the greatest needs are in today's factories. As we worked cut a questionnaire to get ratings of items in an abstract description from respondent production engineers, we encountered considerable lack of cooperation, even though the respondents were in our own company. We found that the questionnaire had features that the respondent production engineers found irritating, and that many points explained in the text were completely missed by our respondents. As we incorporated the feedback, our questionnaire evolved from an abstract diagram accompanied by text to something resembling a programmed textbook in tabular and graphic form. The history seems to confirm the sterotypes about engineers: most of our respondents seemed impatient with abstractions and strongly disinclined to read text.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication  (Volume:PC-15 ,  Issue: 3 )