Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Active magnetostatic wave delay line

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Fetisov, Yu.K. ; Dept. of Phys., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO, USA ; Kabos, P. ; Patton, Carl E.

Two configurations for an active microwave delay line with feedback to improve the loss per unit delay time have been made and characterized. The lines utilized thin yttrium iron garnet (YIG) film, magnetostatic wave (MSW) passive elements, a microwave amplifier, and a variable attenuator connected in a feedback loop. The two delay line setups used a surface wave (MSSW) configuration with a single MG element and a nondispersive configuration with MSSW and backward volume wave (MSBVW) delay lines in series. For each setup, a sequence of delayed pulses at the output is observed when a single microwave pulse is fed to the input. The one-pass delay time T of the pulse through the MSW delay line and the number n of circulations in the feedback loop defines the total delay time nT for the nth pulse. The feedback resulted in a reduction in the output pulse decay rate and longer useful delay times. For a passive delay line with no feedback, typical values of the loss p.u. delay time L and useful delay time (nT)U were -110 dB/μs and 0.1-0.2 μs, respectively. With feedback for the MSSW delay line, a 4.5-GHz operating frequency, and 40 ns input pulses, L and (nT)U were -19 dB/μs and 0.6 μs, respectively. Feedback with the nondispersive delay line gave L and (nT)U values of -12 dB/μs and 3 μS, respectively, for 4.5-GHz, 40-ns input pulses

Published in:

Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:34 ,  Issue: 1 )

Date of Publication:

Jan 1998

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.