By Topic

Comparing FutureGrid, Amazon EC2, and Open Science Grid for Scientific Workflows

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Juve, G. ; Univ. of Southern California, Las Angeles, CA, USA ; Rynge, M. ; Deelman, E. ; Vockler, J.-S.
more authors

Scientists have many computing infrastructures available to conduct their research, including grids and public or private clouds. This article explores the use of these cyber-infrastructures to execute scientific workflows, an important class of scientific applications. In particular, it examines the benefits and drawbacks of cloud and grid systems using the case study of an astronomy application that analyzes data from the NASA Kepler mission to compute periodograms. The authors describe their experiences modeling the periodogram application as a scientific workflow using Pegasus and deploying it on the FutureGrid scientific cloud testbed, the Amazon EC2 commercial cloud, and the Open Science Grid. They also compare and contrast the infrastructures in terms of setup, usability, cost, resource availability, and performance.

Published in:

Computing in Science & Engineering  (Volume:15 ,  Issue: 4 )