Notification:
We are currently experiencing intermittent issues impacting performance. We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

Joint Uncertainty Decoding for Noise Robust Subspace Gaussian Mixture Models

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Liang Lu ; Centre for Speech Technol. Res., Univ. of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK ; Chin, K.K. ; Ghoshal, A. ; Renals, S.

Joint uncertainty decoding (JUD) is a model-based noise compensation technique for conventional Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) based speech recognition systems. Unlike vector Taylor series (VTS) compensation which operates on the individual Gaussian components in an acoustic model, JUD clusters the Gaussian components into a smaller number of classes, sharing the compensation parameters for the set of Gaussians in a given class. This significantly reduces the computational cost. In this paper, we investigate noise compensation for subspace Gaussian mixture model (SGMM) based speech recognition systems using JUD. The total number of Gaussian components in an SGMM is typically very large. Therefore direct compensation of the individual Gaussian components, as performed by VTS, is computationally expensive. In this paper we show that JUD-based noise compensation can be successfully applied to SGMMs in a computationally efficient way. We evaluate the JUD/SGMM technique on the standard Aurora 4 corpus. Our experimental results indicate that the JUD/SGMM system results in lower word error rates compared with a conventional GMM system with either VTS-based or JUD-based noise compensation.

Published in:

Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:21 ,  Issue: 9 )