By Topic

Improved Mapping of Tropical Forests With Optical and SAR Imagery, Part II: Above Ground Biomass Estimation

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Hame, T. ; VTT Tech. Res. Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland ; Rauste, Y. ; Antropov, O. ; Ahola, H.A.
more authors

Performance of the above ground (dry) biomass estimation with the medium resolution optical (ALOS AVNIR) data and radar (ALOS PALSAR) data was evaluated on a tropical forest site in Lao PDR (Laos). The average biomass of ground reference plots was relatively low, 78 t/ha, due to strong anthropogenic influence in most of the study area. The biomass estimates were computed using linear regression analysis and the Probability method that combines unsupervised clustering and fuzzy estimation. The predictions were validated with independent field plot data. With all the methods and data types, the root mean square error (RMSE) ranged from 33.6 t/ha to 40.1 t/ha (44.2% and 52.8% of mean biomass, respectively). The Probability method produced a larger dynamic range to the predictions than the regression models, which saturated at approximately 100 t/ha. Large errors for higher biomass plots increased the RMSE of Probability over the RMSE of the regression models. The bias ranged from -0.8 to 3.9% except with the Probability model for PALSAR data where the bias was 12.5%. Our study showed that PALSAR data were nearly as good for the biomass estimation as the AVNIR data. A combination of mono-temporal ALOS PALSAR and ALOS AVNIR data did not improve biomass estimation over the performance obtained with AVNIR data alone. For the Probability method, ground reference data should be more representative than that available in this study.

Published in:

Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE Journal of  (Volume:6 ,  Issue: 1 )