By Topic

Considerations for Designing a Conduction-Cooled Sample Holder

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Jarvela, J. ; Electromagn., Tampere Univ. of Technol., Tampere, Finland ; Stenvall, A. ; Mikkonen, R.

Usually, superconductive strands are characterized and quality controlled by performing short sample tests. These tests are often carried out using liquid cryogen or cold gas flow as coolant. However, in some measurements, the use of a more adiabatic approach is beneficial. This can be achieved with a conduction-cooled system. The advantages and the disadvantages of using a conduction-cooled measurement are presented. The thermal and electrical aspects of a typical conduction-cooled sample holder are discussed by studying the steady-state and transient operation of such a setup with a 3-D finite-element method model. Also, improving the electrical contact resistance of a clamped current/cooling contact facilitating fast sample changeover was experimentally analyzed. The obtained results indicated that an inadequate sample holder can cause excessive heat generation, can slow down quench recovery, and can complicate burnout protection. Finally, the electrical and thermal properties of typical MgB2 samples under test were modeled to have a significant effect on the operation of a conduction-cooled measurement system. An order of magnitude increase was observed in both ohmic losses and quench recovery time, when the outer sheath material of the simulated superconductor was changed from copper to Monel.

Published in:

Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:23 ,  Issue: 2 )