By Topic

No Bayesians in foxholes

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Breiman, L. ; California Univ., Berkeley, CA

In World War II, there was a saying, “there are no atheists in foxholes.” The implication was that on the front lines and under pressure, soldiers needed someone to pray to. The implication in my title is that when big, real, tough problems need to be solved, there are no Bayesians. For decades, the pages of various statistical journals have been littered with theological arguments on the virtues of the Bayesian approach versus frequentist approaches. I have no intention of continuing the debate on this level. My approach is pragmatic: which approach works best when dealing with real data in solving complex problems?

Published in:

IEEE Expert  (Volume:12 ,  Issue: 6 )