Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

Can a “poor” verification system be a “good” identification system? A preliminary study

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

The purchase and pricing options are temporarily unavailable. Please try again later.
2 Author(s)

The matching accuracy of a biometric system is typically quantified through measures such as the False Match Rate (FMR), False Non-match Rate (FNMR), Equal Error Rate (EER), Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and Cumulative Match Characteristic (CMC) curve. In this work, we analyze the relationship between the ROC and CMC curves, which are two measures commonly used to describe the performance of verification and identification systems, respectively. We establish that it is possible for a biometric system to exhibit “good” verification performance and “poor” identification performance (and vice versa) by demonstrating the conditions required to produce such outcomes. Experimental analysis using synthetically generated match scores confirms our hypothesis that the ROC or CMC alone cannot completely characterize biometric system performance.

Published in:

Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), 2012 IEEE International Workshop on

Date of Conference:

2-5 Dec. 2012

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.