By Topic

Comparison of the Stress Distribution and Fatigue Behavior of 10- and 25- \mu\hbox {m} -Thick Deep-Reactive-Ion-Etched Si Kilohertz Resonators

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Thomas Straub ; G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta , Atlanta, GA, USA ; Pierre-Olivier Theillet ; Christoph Eberl ; Olivier N. Pierron

The stress distribution and fatigue behavior of nominally identical kilohertz fatigue resonators with two different thicknesses, 10 and 25 μm, was compared in this study. The results highlight the non-uniform 3-D stress distribution of the micron-scale notched cantilever beams that depends on the thickness. The areas corresponding to the first principal stress being within 2% of the maximum value are much smaller than the overall notch area and are a function of device thickness. It is also shown that the non-negligible influence of small, nanometer-scale geometrical variations in the dimensions of nominally identical devices on the maximum stress values can be accounted for by measuring the device's resonant frequency (f0). The observed scatter in the fatigue results of these microresonators is in part associated with the challenge in accurately calculating the local stress amplitudes. Despite that large scatter, the fatigue behavior of the 10 and 25 μm thick devices is similar. Particularly, the overall relative decrease rates in f0 are well related to fatigue life (Nf) and can be used to predict Nf within a factor of 5, for Nf ranging from 104 to 1010 cycles.

Published in:

Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems  (Volume:22 ,  Issue: 2 )