By Topic

Reducing torque ripple of switched reluctance machines by relocation of rotor moulding clinches

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Sahin, C. ; Univ. of Kastamonu, Kastamonu, Turkey ; Amac, A.E. ; Karacor, M. ; Emadi, A.

Switched reluctance machines (SRMs) are of great interest because of their simplicity, low-cost, reliability, robustness, fault-tolerance and extended-speed constant-power operation. However, conventional SRMs suffer from high torque ripples. There exist several methods, which have been proposed to reduce torque ripples. One of the proposed methods is to change the geometric structure of the machine. However, analysis of the state-of-the-art designs show that, despite achieving favourable results in applications, the moulding pins of the machines are normally neglected. A motor that gives positive results may get affected negatively by its random moulding during its manufacturing. In this paper, mitigation of torque ripples in short-pitched SRMs (SPSRMs) and fully-pitched SRMs (FPSRMs) are investigated. Three-phase SPSRM and FPSRM are chosen for this study and the effects of the geometric points of moulding pins in the machines are studied comparatively. Maxwell 2D program is used for the analysis and two different models are compared for both SPSRM and FPSRM. The obtained results show that the torque ripples of the two machines are lower when moulding pins are closer to the rotor position. It is reduced by 2.56% at 10%Amps in the proposed SPSRM and 12% at 6%Amps in the proposed FPSRM. It is also observed that the applied method is more effective in reducing torque ripples of FPSRMs than SPSRMs.

Published in:

Electric Power Applications, IET  (Volume:6 ,  Issue: 9 )