By Topic

Comparison between multiple description coding and forward error correction for scalable video coding with different burst lengths

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Zhijie Zhao ; Inst. fuer Informationsverarbeitung, Leibniz Univ. Hannover, Hannover, Germany ; Gunwoo Kim ; Doug Young Suh ; Ostermann, J.

In this paper, a comparison of a scalable multiple description coding (MDC) scheme and the forward error correction (FEC) coding using Raptor code for the scalable extension of H.264/AVC (SVC) is presented. Unequal and equal protection of the base and enhancement layer with different amount of redundancy at the average burst lengths of 2, 5 and 20 are considered. The experimental results show that scalable MDC is generally preferable at the low redundancy rate and long average burst length, while FEC using Raptor code is favorite in case of high redundancy rate and the channel with short average burst length for the resilient delivery of scalable video.

Published in:

Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), 2012 IEEE 14th International Workshop on

Date of Conference:

17-19 Sept. 2012