By Topic

Automatic Artifacts Detection and Classification in Sleep EEG Signals Using Descriptive Statistics and Histogram Analysis: Comparison of Two Detectors

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Migotina, D. ; Laseeb Tech. Univ. of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal ; Calapez, A. ; Rosa, A.

The algorithm for artifacts detection and classification, applying different sets of constraint rules, was proposed. Two automatic artifacts detectors based on the proposed algorithm and thresholding techniques that use descriptive statistics and a histogram analysis, were developed. At first, the performance of both detectors was evaluated by matching with the human expert scoring. Detectors were tested with various threshold values; and ones that provided the best performance results were selected. At the end, two detectors were compared with each other and the best detector was identified. Detected artifacts were classified into three different types: body movement, muscle and slow eye movement artifacts. Analyses of detection and classification results were performed separately for the whole night sleep and for NREM sleep stages 1, 2, 3 and 4. The artifacts detector, based on the application of a threshold, calculated from a histogram, has provided the best detection results with approximately 85% of sensitivity and 84% of correct classification; the best classification results were obtained for body movement artifacts, with approximately 94% of specificity and 99% of correct classification in the analysis, performed for NREM sleep stages 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Published in:

Engineering and Technology (S-CET), 2012 Spring Congress on

Date of Conference:

27-30 May 2012