By Topic

A critical review of partial-discharge models

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Lemke, E. ; Doble Lemke GmbH, Kesselsdorf, Germany

Partial-discharge (PD) measurements in compliance with the standard IEC 60270 are based on the main quantity apparent charge. This term is deduced from a simple PD model comprising a capacitive network. However, from a physical point of view, a PD defect cannot be represented by a capacitance, as argued by Pedersen and his coworkers. As an alternative, Pedersen proposed a field theoretical approach that is based on a dipole model. This more sophisticated concept has been ignored in the past, whereas the capacitive PD model is accepted also nowadays. Apparently, the reason for that is that the charge transfer can easily be calculated for the capacitive equivalent circuit, which is not the case if the field theoretical approach based on the dipole concept is adopted. As will be reported in this article, the analysis can substantially be simplified if instead of gaseous discharges in spherical, elliptical, or cylindrical cavities, as commonly regarded in the relevant literature, the establishment of a dipole moment in a uniform field between solid dielectric layers is considered.

Published in:

Electrical Insulation Magazine, IEEE  (Volume:28 ,  Issue: 6 )