By Topic

Sensing challenges for mechanical aerospace prognostic health monitoring

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Larsen, C.G. ; Etegent Technol., Cincinnati, OH, USA ; Wade, D.R.

No Prognostic Health Monitoring (PHM) algorithm can turn poor sensor data into an accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction, and measuring high-fidelity vibration data in noisy aerospace mechanical systems can be very challenging. Generally, for sensor selection and placement, temperature, masking vibration, electromagnetic interference, and vibration transfer path dynamics must all be considered. Additionally, although aerospace systems are built to exacting tolerances, variability between systems due to manufacturing differences, overhaul, and even variability between vibration sensors must be considered when setting up condition indicators. Many of these factors have been explored through high-frequency transfer-path testing of US Army helicopter gearboxes, resulting in a better understanding of the factors which influence the measured inputs into a PHM system and improved techniques for more reliable condition-based monitoring.

Published in:

Prognostics and Health Management (PHM), 2012 IEEE Conference on

Date of Conference:

18-21 June 2012