By Topic

Performance of elastic image registration against speckle tracking for 2D cardiac motion and strain estimation

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

7 Author(s)
Heyde, B. ; Cardiovascular Imaging &Dynamics, Catholic Univ. of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ; Jasaityte, R. ; Bouchez, S. ; Vandenheuvel, M.
more authors

Despite the availability of multiple solutions for assessing myocardial strain, little is currently known about the relative performance of the different methods. In this study, we sought to contrast two popular strain estimation techniques directly (block-matching and registration) in an in-vivo setting by comparing both to a gold standard reference measurement. Mid short-axis images were acquired with a GE Vivid7 ultrasound system in five open-chest sheep instrumented with ultrasonic microcrystals. Radial (∈RR) and circumferential strain (∈CC) were estimated during four stages: at rest, during esmolol and dobutamine infusion, and during acute ischemia. While the correlations of a well-validated block matching approach and the elastic registration method were comparable for the ∈CC component (0.82 vs 0.81 respectively), imposing regularization during the motion estimation process (i.e. as embedded in the elastic registration method), showed to be advantageous to estimate ∈RR as it improved performance significantly (0.63 vs 0.83; p=0.05). Moreover, the bias and the limits of agreement were also smaller in this direction (p<;0.01).

Published in:

Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2011 IEEE International

Date of Conference:

18-21 Oct. 2011