By Topic

Noncontact Surface Resistivity Measurement Using a Cylindrical Surface Potential Detector With a Corona Charger

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Sugimoto, T. ; Dept. of Electr. Eng., Yamagata Univ., Yonezawa, Japan ; Abe, M. ; Higashiyama, Y.

A noncontact surface resistivity tester was developed by improving the charge decay measurement. The tester has a corona charger and surface potential detectors in a cylindrical grounded body. The corona charger provides a surface charge on the test material, and the surface potential detectors measure the traveling motion of the surface charge. The traveling speed of the surface charge is dependent on the surface resistivity of the test material; therefore, the surface resistivity can be determined without contact to the material. An equivalent circuit with a 1-D ladder circuit was predicted, which includes the surface resistance of the material, the volume resistance of air, and the capacitance between the cylinder and the test material. From analysis of the equivalent circuit, the surface resistivity for an insulative surface was found to be a function of ρs/(ρvδ), where ρs is the surface resistivity of the test material, ρv is the volume resistivity of air, and δ is the gap between the test surface and the cylinder. For conductive and dissipative surfaces, the surface resistivity is dependent on ε0ρs/δ, where ε0 is the permittivity of air. The measurement concepts were experimentally verified using a needle-type corona charger, two induction probes, and a surface potential meter. The predicted surface resistivity measured using this method was consistent with the surface resistivity measured with a contact-type surface resistivity tester.

Published in:

Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:48 ,  Issue: 5 )