By Topic

Circuit-Level Timing Error Tolerance for Low-Power DSP Filters and Transforms

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Whatmough, P.N. ; Electr. & Electron. Eng. Dept., Univ. Coll. London, London, UK ; Das, S. ; Bull, D.M. ; Darwazeh, I.

In this paper, we present a novel circuit-level timing error mitigation technique, which aims to increase energy-efficiency of digital signal processing datapaths without loss of robustness. Timing errors are detected using razor flip-flops on critical-paths, and the error-rate feedback is used to control a dynamic voltage scaling control loop. In place of conventional razor error correction by replay, we propose a new approach to bound the magnitude of intermittent timing errors at the circuit level. A timing guard-band is created by shaping the path delay distribution such that the critical paths correspond to a group of least-significant bit registers. These end-points are ensured to be critical by modifying the topology of the final stage carry-merge adder, and by using tool-based device sizing. Hence, timing violations lead to weakly correlated logical errors of small magnitude in a mean-squared-error sense. We examine this approach in an finite-impulse response (FIR) filter and a 2-D discrete cosine transform implementation, in 32-nm CMOS. Power saving compared to a conventional design at iso-frequency is 21%-23% at the typical corner, while retaining a voltage guard-band to protect against fast transient changes in switching activity and supply noise. The impact on minimum clock period is small (16%-20%), as it does not necessitate the use of ripple-carry adders and also requires only a bare minimum of additional design effort.

Published in:

Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:21 ,  Issue: 6 )