By Topic

Handling Multiple Failures in IP Networks through Localized On-Demand Link State Routing

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Robertson, G. ; Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Eng., Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA ; Nelakuditi, S.

It has been observed that transient failures are fairly common in IP backbone networks and there have been several proposals based on local rerouting to provide high network availability despite failures. While most of these proposals are effective in handling single failures, they either cause loops or drop packets in the case of multiple independent failures. To ensure forwarding continuity even with multiple failures, we propose Localized On-demand Link State (LOLS) routing. Under LOLS, each packet carries a blacklist, which is a minimal set of failed links encountered along its path, and the next hop is determined by excluding the blacklisted links. We show that the blacklist can be reset when the packet makes forward progress towards the destination and hence can be encoded in a few bits. Furthermore, blacklist-based forwarding entries at a router can be precomputed for a given set of failures requiring protection. While the LOLS approach is generic, this paper describes how it can be applied to ensure forwarding to all reachable destinations in case of any two link or node failures. Our evaluation of this failure scenario based on various real network topologies reveals that LOLS needs 6 bits in the worst case to convey the blacklist information. We argue that this overhead is acceptable considering that LOLS routing deviates from the optimal path by a small stretch only while routing around failures.

Published in:

Network and Service Management, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:9 ,  Issue: 3 )