Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Modeling the Impact of Partial Hepatectomy on the Hepatic Hemodynamics Using a Rat Model

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

9 Author(s)
Debbaut, C. ; Biofluid, Tissue & Solid Mech. for Med. Applic. (bioMMeda) Res. Group, Ghent Univ., Ghent, Belgium ; De Wilde, D. ; Casteleyn, C. ; Cornillie, P.
more authors

Due to the growing shortage of donor livers, more patients are waiting for transplantation. Living donor liver transplantation may help expanding the donor pool, but is often confronted with the small-for-size syndrome. Since the hemodynamic effects of partial hepatectomy are not fully understood, we developed an electrical rat liver model to compare normal with resected liver hemodynamics. Detailed geometrical data and 3-D reconstructions of the liver vasculature of two rats were gathered by combining vascular corrosion casting, micro-CT scanning, and image processing. Data extrapolations allowed obtaining a total liver pressure- and flow-driven electrical analog. Subsequently, virtual resections led to 70%, 80%, or 90% partial hepatectomy models. Results demonstrated hyperperfusion effects such as portal hypertension and elevated lobe-specific portal venous flows (11, 12, and 24 mmHg, and 1.0-3.0, 1.8-3.5, and 7.4 ml/min for 70%, 80%, and 90% hepatectomy, respectively). Comparison of two 90% resection techniques demonstrated different total arterial flows (0.28 ml/min versus 0.61 ml/min), portal (24 mmHg versus 21 mmHg), and sinusoidal pressures (14 mmHg versus 9.5-12 mmHg), probably leading to better survival for lower portal and sinusoidal pressures. Toward the future, the models may be extrapolated to human livers and help us to optimize hepatectomy planning.

Published in:

Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:59 ,  Issue: 12 )

Date of Publication:

Dec. 2012

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.