Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Assessing HPC Failure Detectors for MPI Jobs

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Kharbas, K. ; North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, USA ; Donghoon Kim ; Hoefler, T. ; Mueller, F.

Reliability is one of the challenges faced by exascale computing. Components are poised to fail during large-scale executions given current mean time between failure (MTBF) projections. To cope with failures, resilience methods have been proposed as explicit or transparent techniques. For the latter techniques, this paper studies the challenge of fault detection. This work contributes a study on generic fault detection capabilities at the MPI level and beyond. The objective is to assess different detectors, which ultimately may or may not be implemented within the application's runtime layer. A first approach utilizes a periodic liveness check while a second method promotes sporadic checks upon communication activities. The contributions of this paper are two-fold: (a) We provide generic interposing of MPI applications for fault detection. (b) We experimentally compare periodic and sporadic methods for liveness checking. We show that the sporadic approach, even though it imposes lower bandwidth requirements and utilizes lower frequency checking, results in equal or worse application performance than a periodic liveness test for larger number of nodes. We further show that performing liveness checks in separation from MPI applications results in lower overhead than inter-positioning, as demonstrated by our prototypes. Hence, we promote separate periodic fault detection as the superior approach for fault detection.

Published in:

Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP), 2012 20th Euromicro International Conference on

Date of Conference:

15-17 Feb. 2012

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.