By Topic

Comparison of List-Mode and DIRECT Approaches for Time-of-Flight PET Reconstruction

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Daube-Witherspoon, M.E. ; Dept. of Radiol., Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; Matej, S. ; Werner, M.E. ; Surti, S.
more authors

Early clinical results with time-of-flight (TOF) positron emission tomography (PET) systems have demonstrated the advantages of TOF information in PET reconstruction. Reconstruction approaches in TOF-PET systems include list-mode and binned iterative algorithms as well as confidence-weighted analytic methods. List-mode iterative TOF reconstruction retains the resolutions of the data in the spatial and temporal domains without any binning approximations but is computationally intensive. We have developed an approach [DIRECT (direct image reconstruction for TOF)] to speed up TOF-PET reconstruction that takes advantage of the reduced angular sampling requirement of TOF data by grouping list-mode data into a small number of azimuthal views and co-polar tilts and depositing the grouped events into histo-images, arrays with the sampling and geometry of the final image. All physical effects are included in the system model and deposited in the same histo-image structure. Using histo-images allows efficient computation during reconstruction without ray-tracing or interpolation operations. The DIRECT approach was compared with 3-D list-mode TOF ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction for phantom and patient data taken on the University of Pennsylvania research LaBr_3 TOF-PET scanner. The total processing and reconstruction time for these studies with DIRECT without attention to code optimization is approximately 25%-30% that of list-mode TOF-OSEM to achieve comparable image quality. Furthermore, the reconstruction time for DIRECT is independent of the number of events and/or sizes of the spatial and TOF kernels, while the time for list-mode TOF-OSEM increases with more events or larger kernels. The DIRECT approach is able to reproduce the image quality of list-mode iterative TOF reconstruction both qualitatively and quantitatively in measured data with a reduced time.

Published in:

Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:31 ,  Issue: 7 )