By Topic

Time-frequency analysis of atrial fibrillation comparing morphology-clustering based QRS-T cancellation with blind source separation in multi-lead surface ECG recordings

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

6 Author(s)
Di Marco, L.Y. ; DEIS, Univ. of Bologna, Bologna, Italy ; King, S. ; Bourke, J. ; Chiari, L.
more authors

To separate the atrial (AA) from the ventricular (VA) electrical activity in surface ECG recordings of atrial fibrillation (AF), various methods have been proposed, such as QRS-T cancellation by beat-averaged template subtraction, and blind source separation (BSS). Although QRS-T cancellation is computationally more efficient than BSS, and allows the preservation of spatial information, it is sensitive to morphology changes, which produce large residuals in AA, biasing the frequency analysis. Aim of this study was: (i) to propose an improved approach to VA cancellation based on k-means morphology clustering (MC); (ii) to validate its ability to estimate AF dominant frequency (DF) on a standard database with intra-cardiac and surface ECG recordings (IAFDB, Physionet.org); (iii) to compare the temporal evolution of the spectral content of MC-estimated AA (MC-AA) with the one obtained from a reference BSS method based on Independent component analysis (ICA) and second-order blind identification (SOBI), in 14 body surface potential map (BSPM) recordings. QRS-T amplitude in MC-AA was significantly lower (p<;0.001) than in ECG (in closest BSPM channel to V1). The validation on IAFDB showed no significant difference in DF estimation (p=0.546) in 17 recordings. Also no significant difference in DF estimation (p=0.208) with respect to the reference BSS method was observed. The proposed QRS-T cancellation method effectively suppresses VA and accurately estimates DF compared to an established BSS method.

Published in:

Computing in Cardiology, 2011

Date of Conference:

18-21 Sept. 2011