By Topic

An Integrated Decision Support Model to Assess Reviewers for Research Project Selection

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Wei Xu ; Sch. of Inf., Renmin Univ. of China, Beijing, China ; Wei Du ; Jian Ma ; Wei Wang
more authors

Reviewers play a significant role in research project selection, because their opinions will have great influence on the decision of the projects which will be funded. Current methods mainly focus on the evaluation of reviewers' competitiveness in a certain research areas, while ignoring the performance of reviewers whether is suitable to review a proposal. In this paper, a group decision support model is proposed to assess reviewers' performance in peer review process. In the proposed model, competitiveness and relevance of reviewers are considered to evaluate reviewers. It integrates analytic hierarchy process (AHP), scoring method and fuzzy linguistic processing. An illuminating example is used to show the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results find that the proposed method is a reasonable method to assess reviewers, and it can be potentially applied to reviewer evaluation in the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC).

Published in:

System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on

Date of Conference:

4-7 Jan. 2012