By Topic

Low-Voltage, Wide-Locking-Range, Millimeter-Wave Divide-by-5 Injection-Locked Frequency Dividers

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Ming-Wei Li ; Institute of Computer and Communication Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering , National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, R.O.C ; Po-Chi Wang ; Tzuen-Hsi Huang ; Huey-Ru Chuang

A new injector topology is proposed for the design of CMOS millimeter-wave divide-by-5 injection-locked frequency dividers (ILFDs). The topology is based on a distributed-element harmonic termination by an open-stub structure connected to the floating source end of the differential injection pair. ILFDs operating at 24 and 60 GHz are demonstrated in this study. The new topology combined with an N-MOS cross-coupled oscillator core can greatly reduce the supply voltage and power consumption requirement of the divider. The simulated results indicate that, by using the distributed-element harmonic termination, the locking range can be improved by over 40 and 72% for the 24- and 60-GHz operations, respectively. The test circuits for the 24- and 60-GHz ILFDs are implemented by a 0.18-m and 90-nm CMOS process, respectively. The power consumption is 7.4 and 3.75 mW at a supply voltage of 0.7 and 0.6 V, with a very wide locking range of 1.9 and 4.1 GHz, for the 24- and 60-GHz ILFDs, respectively. The proposed 24- and 60-GHz divide-by-5 ILFDs have the outstanding figure-of-merit (FOM) values of 6.4 and 69.4, respectively, compared with reported works.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques  (Volume:60 ,  Issue: 3 )