By Topic

Proximal compared with middle and distal gastric carcinoma: Expression of VEGF and VEGF-C

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Bin Wang ; Med. Imaging Center of the Affiliated Hosp., Binzhou Med. Univ., Binzhou, China ; Peng Dong ; Xi-zhen Wang ; Shi-zhuang Zhang
more authors

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the difference between the proximal, middle and distal third gastric carcinoma in the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C). MATERIALS: This experiment was carried out at Medical Imaging Centre of the Affiliated Hospital, Weifang Medical University from February 2002 to September 2008. Eighty-one patients with histopathology proved advanced gastric carcinoma (seventy-two cases adenocarcinoma, five cases signet-ring cell carcinoma, three cases mucinous adenocarcinoma, and one case carcinoid) were included. METHODS: PV-9000 immunohistochemical staining was used to investigate the expression of VEGF and VEGF-C in all the specimens. The antibody against factor VIII-related antigen was used to display vascular endothelial cells, and MVD was examined by counting the factor VIII-positive vascular endothelial cells. RESULTS: The positive rates of VEGF and VEGF-C expression in 81 cases were 74.1% (60/81) and 64.2% (52/81) respectively, and the MVD averaged 60.86±23.48. The positive rates of VEGF and VEGF-C expression in the PGC were 78.6% (33/42) and 69.0% (29/42) respectively, and the MVD averaged 60.45±23.45. The positive rates of VEGF and VEGF-C expression in the MGC/DGC were 69.2% (27/39) and 59.0% (23/39) respectively, and the MVD averaged 62.23±23.48. The TNM staging difference was significantly between the PGC and the MGC/DGC (P<;0.05). Histologic differentiated had no difference between the PGC and the MGC/DGC (P>;0.05). The gastric bare area (GBA) involved was common in the PGC than the MGC/DGC (P<;0.05). The averaged MVD, the expression of VEGF and VEGF-C had no difference between the PGC and the MGC/DGC (P>;0.05). CONCLUSION: The prognostic difference of PGC, MGC and DGC may be not related to the different expression of the MVD, VEGF, VEGF-C.

Published in:

IT in Medicine and Education (ITME), 2011 International Symposium on  (Volume:2 )

Date of Conference:

9-11 Dec. 2011