By Topic

Improved Estimation of Water Chlorophyll Concentration With Semisupervised Gaussian Process Regression

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Yakoub Bazi ; ALISR Laboratory, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia ; Naif Alajlan ; Farid Melgani

This paper proposes a novel semisupervised regression framework for estimating chlorophyll concentrations in subsurface waters from remotely sensed imagery. This framework integrates multiobjective optimization and Gaussian processes (GPs) for boosting the accuracy of the estimation process when conditioned by limited labeled-sample availability. To this end, the labeled samples are exploited in conjunction with unlabeled ones (available at zero cost from the image under analysis) for learning the regression model. The estimation of the target of these unlabeled samples is handled by the simultaneous optimization of two different criteria expressing the generalization capabilities of the GP estimator. The first is the empirical risk quantified in terms of the mean square error measure, and the second is the log marginal likelihood, which merges two terms expressing the model complexity and the data fit capability, respectively. In order to alleviate the computational burden and, possibly, to improve the estimation process accuracy, two different selection strategies of unlabeled samples are compared to the simple random-sampling procedure. They are based on the estimated variance provided by the GP estimator and the differential entropy measure, respectively. Experimental results obtained on simulated and real data sets are reported and discussed.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing  (Volume:50 ,  Issue: 7 )