By Topic

A Novel Heuristic Method for Application-Dependent Testing of a SRAM-Based FPGA Interconnect

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Kumar, T.N. ; Dept. of Electr. & Electron. Eng., Univ. of Nottingham, Semenyih, Malaysia ; Lombardi, Fabrizio

This paper presents a new method for generating configurations for application-dependent testing of a SRAM-based FPGA interconnect. This method connects an activating input to multiple nets, thus generating activating test vectors for detecting stuck-at, open, and bridging faults. This arrangement permits a reduction in the number of redundant configurations, thus also achieving a reduction in test time for application-dependent testing at full fault coverage. As the underlying solution requires an exponential complexity, a heuristic algorithm that is polynomial and greedy in nature (based on sorting) is used for net selection in the configuration generation process. It is proved that this algorithm has an execution complexity of O(L3) (where L is the number of LUTs in the design). The proposed method requires at most log2(M + 2) configurations (where M denotes the number of activating inputs) as Walsh coding is employed. Moreover, it is scalable with respect to LUT inputs. Extensive logic-based simulation results are provided for ISCAS89 sequential benchmark designs implemented on Xilinx Virtex4 FPGAs; these results shows that the proposed method achieves a considerable reduction in the number of test configurations compared with methods found in the technical literature (on average, a reduction of 49.5 percent).

Published in:

Computers, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:62 ,  Issue: 1 )