By Topic

An Experimental Comparison of Production Planning Using Clearing Functions and Iterative Linear Programming-Simulation Algorithms

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Kacar, N.B. ; Edward P. Fitts Dept. of Ind. & Syst. Eng., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, USA ; Irdem, D.F. ; Uzsoy, R.

We compare the performance of three algorithms for production planning with workload-dependent lead times. These include a clearing function model using two different methods for estimating the clearing functions, and two iterative algorithms that combine linear programming and simulation models. Our experimental comparison uses a simulation model of a re-entrant bottleneck system built with attributes of a real-world semiconductor fabrication environment. We vary the bottleneck utilization, demand patterns, the mean time to failure, and the mean time to repair. Results indicate that the clearing function model performs better than the iterative algorithms on the scaled-down system considered, giving less variable production plans and higher profit values.

Published in:

Semiconductor Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:25 ,  Issue: 1 )