By Topic

A Performance Evaluation of Fingerprint Minutia Descriptors

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Jianjiang Feng ; Dept. of Autom., Tsinghua Univ., Beijing, China ; Jie Zhou

Minutiae-based matching method is the most widely used fingerprint matching method and most minutiae matching algorithms employ minutia descriptors of certain type. A good minutia descriptor should be distinctive and at the same time robust in difficult situations, i.e., noise, occlusion and plastic distortion. Many different minutia descriptors have been proposed in the literature, which can be coarsely classified into three categories: image-based, texture-based, and minutia-based. These descriptors have not been evaluated systematically. In this paper, seven different descriptors are evaluated according to local matching accuracy for four types of fingerprint pairs: good quality, poor quality, small common region, and large plastic distortion. Experimental results show that the texture-based descriptor and Minutia Cylinder-Code (MCC) are the two most accurate descriptors. In the case of small common region, texture-based descriptor ranks first, while in the rest three cases, MCC is the most accurate one.

Published in:

Hand-Based Biometrics (ICHB), 2011 International Conference on

Date of Conference:

17-18 Nov. 2011