Scheduled System Maintenance:
On May 6th, single article purchases and IEEE account management will be unavailable from 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM ET (12:00 - 16:00 UTC). We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

Beat-to-beat cardiac output inference using heart sounds

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

7 Author(s)
Couceiro, R. ; Dept. of Inf. Eng., Univ. of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal ; Carvalho, P. ; Paiva, R.P. ; Henriques, J.
more authors

Cardiac output (CO) change is the primary compensatory mechanism that responds to oxygenation demand. Its continuous monitoring has great potential for the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular diseases, both in hospital as well as in ambulatory settings. However, CO measurements are currently limited to hospital settings only. In this paper, we present an extension of the model proposed by Finkelstein for beat-to-beat CO assessment. We use a nonlinear model consisting of a two-layer feed-forward artificial neural network. In addition to demographic (body surface area and age) and physiological parameters (HR), surrogates of contractility, afterload and mean arterial pressure based on systolic time intervals (STIs), estimated from echocardiography and heart sounds are used as inputs to our models. The results showed that the proposed models - with echocardiography as reference - produce better estimations of stroke volume/CO than the Finkelstein model (12.83±10.66 ml vs 7.23±6.6 ml), as well as higher correlation (0.46 vs 0.82).

Published in:

Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE

Date of Conference:

Aug. 30 2011-Sept. 3 2011