By Topic

The effects of inhomogeneities and anisotropies on electrocardiographic fields: a 3-D finite-element study

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Klepfer, R.N. ; Dept. of Bioeng., Utah Univ., Salt Lake City, UT, USA ; Johnson, C.R. ; MacLeod, Robert S.

The aim of this study was to quantify the effects of selected inhomogeneities and anisotropies on computed electric potential fields associated with the electrocardiographic forward problem. The model construction was based on the Utah Torso model and included geometry for major anatomical structures such as subcutaneous fat, skeletal muscle, and lungs, as well as for epicardial fatpads, major arteries and veins, and the sternum, ribs, spine, and clavicles. Measured epicardial potentials served as the electrical source for solutions to the electrocardiographic forward problem computed using the finite element method (FEM). The geometry of the torso model for each simulation was constant, but different combinations of conductivities were assigned to individual organs or tissues. Comparisons of different conductivity combinations followed one of two basic schemes: 1) a homogeneous torso served as the reference against which we compared simulations with a single organ or tissue and assigned its nominal conductivity, or 2) a fully inhomogeneous torso served as the reference and we removed the effect of individual organs or tissues by assigning it the homogeneous conductivity value. When single inhomogeneities were added to an otherwise homogeneous isotropic model, anisotropic skeletal muscle (at a 15:1 anisotropy ratio) and the right and left lung had larger average effects (12.8, 12.7, and 12.1% relative error (RE), respectively) than the other inhomogeneities tested. Our results for removing single inhomogeneities show that the subcutaneous fat, the anisotropic skeletal muscle (with the degree of anisotropy equal to 7:1), and the lungs have larger average impacts on the body surface potential distributions than other elements of the model (with values of 14.9, 12.6, and 11.7% RE, respectively). The results also show that the size of the effect depended strongly on the distribution of epicardial potentials. The results of this study suggest that accurate representation- - of tissue inhomogeneity has a significant effect on the accuracy of the forward solution, with regions near the torso surface playing a larger role, in general, than those near the heart.

Published in:

Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:44 ,  Issue: 8 )