By Topic

“Precise is better than light” a document analysis study about quality of business process models

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Reggio, G. ; Dipt. di Inf. e Sci. dell''Inf. - DISI, Univ. di Genova, Genova, Italy ; Leotta, M. ; Ricca, F.

Business process modelling is often used in the initial phases of traditional software development to reduce faulty requirements and as starting point for building SOA based applications. Often, modellers produce business process models without following recognized guidelines and opt for “light” models where nodes representing the actions are simply decorated with natural language text. The potential consequence of this practice is that the quality of built business process models may be low. In this paper, we propose a method based on manual transformations to detect flaws in “light” business process models expressed as activity diagrams. Using that method we have executed a document analysis study with 14 business process models taken by books and websites. Preliminary results of this study show that almost all the analysed business process models contain errors and style violations (precisely 92% of them).

Published in:

Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE), 2011 First International Workshop on

Date of Conference:

30-30 Aug. 2011