By Topic

The Diversity-Multiplexing Tradeoff of the Dynamic Decode-and-Forward Protocol on a MIMO Half-Duplex Relay Channel

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Karmakar, S. ; Dept. of Electr. Comput. & Energy Eng., Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA ; Varanasi, M.K.

The diversity-multiplexing tradeoff of the dynamic decode-and-forward protocol is characterized for the half-duplex three-terminal (m, k, n)-relay channel where the source, relay and the destination terminals have m, k and n antennas, respectively. The tradeoff curve is obtained as a solution to a simple, two-variable, convex optimization problem which is explicitly solved in closed-form for certain special classes of relay channels, namely, the (1, k, 1) relay channel, the (n, 1, n) relay channel and the (2, k, 2) relay channel. Moreover, the tradeoff curves for a certain class of relay channels, such as the (m, k, n >; k) channels, are found to be identical to those for the decode-and-forward protocol for the full duplex channel while for other classes of channels they are marginally lower at high multiplexing gains. Our results also show that for some classes of relay channels and at low multiplexing gains the diversity orders of the dynamic decode-and-forward protocol are greater than those of the static compress-and-forward protocol which in turn is known to be tradeoff optimal over all static half duplex protocols. In general, the dynamic decode-and-forward protocol has a performance that is comparable to that of the static compress-and-forward protocol which, unlike the dynamic decode-and-forward protocol, requires global channel state information at the relay node. Its performance is also close to that of the decode-and-forward protocol over the full-duplex relay channel thereby indicating that the half-duplex constraint can be compensated for by the dynamic operation of the relay wherein the relay switches from the receive to the transmit mode based on the source-relay channel quality.

Published in:

Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:57 ,  Issue: 10 )