By Topic

A Quality-Distinction Model of IT Capabilities: Conceptualization and Two-Stage Empirical Validation Using CMMi Processes

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Rajiv Kishore ; Department of Management Science and Systems, School of Management, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo , USA ; Matthew E. Swinarski ; Eric Jackson ; H. Raghav Rao

In this paper, we develop a model of information technology (IT) service provider capabilities termed the quality distinction (QD) model that is theoretically rooted in the resource-based view and quality management literatures, and operationalized using the widely used capability maturity model (CMM) framework. The QD model is theorized to consist of one dynamic capability (i.e., process adaptation capability) and three operational capabilities (i.e., life cycle, prevention quality, and appraisal quality capabilities). These four capabilities are initially operationalized using definitions of the 22 processes in the CMM integration framework. A panel of experts is used to assign the 22 processes to the four capabilities in the QD model. Rigorous scale-refinement procedures are used and 15 CMM processes are retained as a result. Survey data collected from IT service providers are, then, used to compare the theorized QD model with the staged and continuous models in the CMM framework. Results from a covariance-based structural equation modeling analysis provide good support to the hypothesis that the QD model is superior to the two CMM models (the staged and continuous representations), with the theorized model showing high fit indices and high psychometric properties. Results also provide support for the hypothesis that processes should be operationalized as routines with a combination of both ostensive and performative aspects.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management  (Volume:59 ,  Issue: 3 )