By Topic

Towards a human reliability assessment in process model development: An empirical investigation on routing elements

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
A. Nielen ; Inst. of Ind. Eng. & Ergonomics, RWTH Aachen Univ., Aachen, Germany ; S. Mütze-Niewöhner ; C. M. Schlick

Process models provide a sound basis for quality management systems (QMS). Inconsistencies between process models and corporate reality are a common phenomenon in corporate practice. Erroneous routing is a major source for these inconsistencies that might hinder process implementation and maintenance as well as continuous improvement efforts. The approach presented in this paper accounts for a more active participation of employees in order to further increase the economical benefit of QMS. To this purpose, a human performance analysis in process model development with regard to routing elements was conducted. The results derived from data of 64 subjects show that omission and erroneous execution of routing elements is considerably higher for novices than for subjects with theoretical knowledge and experienced modelers. However, routing elements like the split and join or an embedded iteration are prone to reasoning fallacies and possible sources for inconsistencies.

Published in:

Quality and Reliability (ICQR), 2011 IEEE International Conference on

Date of Conference:

14-17 Sept. 2011