Referenced Items are not available for this document.
The u.s. Supreme Court's ruling June 6, 2011, in Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems (No. 09-1159) reinforced the historical rights of inventors and sent a strong message to Congress about maintaining those rights, according to the IEEE. The decision stated that federal technology-transfer laws “do not vest title to federally funded inventions in federal contractors or authorize contractors to unilaterally take title to such inventions.” It affirmed a federal appeals court ruling making Stanford and Roche co-owners of a patent for technology to detect HIV levels in a patient's blood.
Published in:
Antennas and Propagation Magazine, IEEE
(Volume:53
,
Issue:
3
)
Date of Publication: June 2011
- Page(s):
- 211
- ISSN :
- 1045-9243
- Digital Object Identifier :
- 10.1109/MAP.2011.6028462
- Product Type:
- Journals & Magazines
- Date of Current Version :
- 26 September 2011
- Issue Date :
- June 2011
- Sponsored by :
- IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society
About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies
A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.
