Close category search window
 

Secure extensions of FPGA soft core processors for symmetric key cryptography

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Gaspar, L. ; Lab. Hubert Curien, Univ. de Lyon, St. Etienne, France ; Fischer, V. ; Bossuet, L. ; Fouquet, R.

When used in cryptographic applications, general-purpose processors are often completed by a cryptographic accelerator - crypto-coprocessor. Secret keys are usually stored in the internal registers of the processor, and are vulnerable to attacks on protocols, software/firmware or cache memory. The paper presents three ways of extending soft general purpose processors for cryptographic applications. The proposed extension is aimed at symmetric key cryptography and it guarantees secure key management. Three security zones are created and physically separated in each of three configurations: processor, cipher and key storage zones. In the three zones, the secret keys are manipulated in a different manner - in clear or enciphered, as common data or keys. The security zones are separated on the protocol, system, architectural and physical levels. The proposed principle is validated on Altera NIOS II, Xilinx MicroBlaze and Actel Cortex M1 soft core processor extensions. The NIOS II processor needs fewer clock cycles per data block encryption, because the security module is included in the processor's data path. The data path of the MicroBlaze is unchanged and thus shorter, but additional clock cycles are necessary for data transfers between the processor and the security module. The Cortex M1 processor is connected via AHB bus and the cryptographic extension is accessed as an ordinary peripheral - a coprocessor. Although the interfacing is different, the three processors with their extensions attain the required high security level.

Published in:
Reconfigurable Communication-centric Systems-on-Chip (ReCoSoC), 2011 6th International Workshop on

Date of Conference: 20-22 June 2011

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.