By Topic

Comparison of two methods for automatic range alignment in ISAR imaging

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Berger, T. ; Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt (FFI), Kjeller, Norway ; Tollisen, S. ; Hamran, S.-E.

A maximum likelihood algorithm for translational motion estimation (TME) in ISAR imaging is described and compared with prominent point processing (PPP). It is suggested that the kurtosis (fourth order central moment) of averaged range profiles can be used to decide on which of the two methods that gives the best results in terms of image sharpness. Experimental data of a small aircraft is collected and processed in short intervals. Results from the PPP and the TME algorithms are compared, automatically in terms of a sharpness measure, and also by user inspection. The results indicate that for low kurtosis regions the TME method should be used, while for high kurtosis regions, the PPP method is preferred.

Published in:

Radar Conference (RADAR), 2011 IEEE

Date of Conference:

23-27 May 2011