By Topic

Empirical evidence against CAPM: Relating alphas and returns to betas

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Mayur Agrawal ; Purdue University, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA ; Debabrata Mohapatra ; Ilya Pollak

One of the consequences of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is that the expected excess return of a financial instrument is proportional to the expected excess market return. The proportionality constant, called the instrument's beta, is the coefficient in the linear least-squares fit of the excess return of the instrument with the excess return of the market. CAPM therefore implies that stocks with larger empirical estimates of beta will tend to produce larger returns. Following the testing procedure from a 2006 study by Grantham, we analyze this hypothesis using the stock return data for the S&P 500 constituents from 1965 to 2009. We obtain several statistically significant results inconsistent with the hypothesis.

Published in:

2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

Date of Conference:

22-27 May 2011