By Topic

Comparison of two models of success prediction in software development projects

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Andrey Maglyas ; Lappeenranta University of Technology, Skinnarilankatu 34, FI-53851, Finland ; Uolevi Nikula ; Kari Smolander

Background: The size and complexity of software development projects are growing. At the same time, the proportion of successful projects is still quite low according to the previous research. One way to approach this problem is to develop and use methods that can predict project success beforehand and act accordingly. Aim: The objective of this study is to compare two existing models of success prediction (The Standish Group and McConnell models) and to determine their strengths and weaknesses. Method: The research was done as an empirical study. A survey with structured forms and theme-based interviews were used as the data collection methods. The comparison is made with observations from 48 projects in Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine. In addition, 19 interviews were conducted during the study. Conclusions: The results show that The Standish Group has a tendency to overestimate the problems in a project. McConnell predicts successful projects pretty well but underestimates the percentage of unsuccessful projects.

Published in:

Software Engineering Conference (CEE-SECR), 2010 6th Central and Eastern European

Date of Conference:

13-15 Oct. 2010