Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

Working Distance Comparison of Inductive and Electromagnetic Couplings for Wireless and Passive Underwater Monitoring System of Rinsing Process in Semiconductor Facilities

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Xu Zhang ; Sch. of Electr. Comput. & Energy Eng., Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ, USA ; Junseok Chae

This paper reports a side-by-side comparison of two wireless and passive sensing systems: inductive and electromagnetic (EM) couplings for an application of in-situ and real-time monitoring of wafer cleanliness in the rinsing process at semiconductor/microelectromechanical system (MEMS) manufacturing facilities. A MEMS sensor is designed to measure the resistivity of water, corresponding to the ionic concentration, to evaluate the rinsing process inside the micro-features. The transponder, containing the MEMS sensor, receives power from an external interrogator, modulates the resistivity data, and emits back the modulated signal to the interrogator, in all wireless and battery-free operation. Two wireless systems based on inductive and EM couplings have been implemented on 4-inch glass wafers, maintaining the wafer form factor. Inductive coupling system has parasitic electric field coupling. The working distance of the inductive coupling system is attenuated in water and is likely limited by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), while that of the EM coupling is primarily limited by the coupled power. Hence, inductive coupling is suitable for a short distance measurement that allows more sophisticated functionality with sufficient power, whereas EM coupling could be optimized for long distance detection but has a tight power budget. The implemented on-wafer wireless monitoring units achieve a working distance of 6 and 25 cm with a concentration resolution of less than 2% (4 ppb for a 200 ppb solution) for inductive and EM couplings, respectively.

Published in:

Sensors Journal, IEEE  (Volume:11 ,  Issue: 11 )

Date of Publication:

Nov. 2011

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.